Newport Beach vs. Newport Beach at John Wayne Airport

Corporate jets at John Wayne Airport. Photo by author

Looks like the air battle over Newport Beach has flared up again. In a mini-replay of recent history, the Orange County Board of Supervisors is considering expanding business jet operations at John Wayne Airport–prompting the rich folks in Newport to protest that the plan would increase noise and air pollution over their community. While these are largely the same arguments put forward by South County residents 20 years ago when the county proposed building an international airport at the old El Toro Marine Corps Air Station, what’s very different now is that Newport Beach is helping to feed the very airport demand the city also opposes.

Under the new plan–known as the General Aviation Improvement Project (GAIP), which came up for discussion at the May 7 Supervisors’ meeting–the airport would handle 86 business jets (up from the current 65) while losing 137 spaces for smaller prop planes, according to a May 8 Voice of OC story. Doing this would “maximize the efficiency and safety of facilities and facilitate prioritization of future general aviation improvements,” according to a county staff report on the proposal.

A gaggle of Newport Beach residents and officials say the project’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is a disaster waiting to happen. They say general aviation (GA) jets are about as loud as big commercial airliners, and an increase in their flight operations will further degrade their quality of life.

U.S. Rep. Harley Rouda (D–Newport Beach … and an extremely wealthy former land developer who’s probably ridden on a corporate jet once or twice in his life) is one such opponent. “I am concerned that the current EIR does not adequately take into consideration the noise, greenhouse gas emissions, and health effects of the project,” the congressman says in a May 6 statement. “The EIR is quick to attribute any future noise increase to commercial operators but fails to take into account the existing level of noise that has harmed the community.”

Newport Beach Mayor Diane Brooks Dixon is another opponent. In addition to writing a March 25 letter to Board Chairwoman Lisa Bartlett denouncing the plan, she also attended the May 7 Supervisors’ meeting, along with dozens of her constituents.

“While the GAIP speaks of modernization, the city’s residents instead see the burden of more GA jet operations, diminished air quality, additional noise and flights operating at all hours,” Dixon states in her letter to Bartlett. “Equally important, any actions concerning the GAIP must take into account safety, security and accountability for and to all, not just the select few passengers partaking in GA jet travel.”

Dixon’s dismissing the support for the project to a “select few passengers” is a bit odd, considering that a fair portion of those same passengers come from Newport Beach itself–which is, after all, one of the wealthiest cities in the U.S. In fact, a 2018 Bloomberg story compared the city’s $97,597 per capita income to the “price tag of a new Porsche 911 Carrera.”

For fun, I visited the airport on May 8 and wrote down the tail numbers of 15 random corporate jets I saw parked alongside Campus Boulevard. Then, using the Federal Aviation Administration’s tail number search engine, I determined that five of those aircraft–a third of my admittedly unscientific sampling–were in some way tied to Newport Beach.

Billionaire and Newport Coast resident Henry Nicholas’ famous 1993 Gulfstream G-IV was there–the same plane the feds seized back in 2008, saying it was used to transport drugs, only to drop the charges two years later and return the plane. Also present was a 1999 Cessna 560XL registered to Kremer Co., a Santa Ana-based firm started by Newport Beach resident and former Irvine Co. president Peter Kremer.

There was also a 2000 Cessna 560XL belonging to Newport Beach-based Sand Creek Investors, and a 2006 Cessna 560XL (damn, that’s a popular model) owned by Newport Beach-based IBC Hospitality. And I’m also including a 1999 Bombadier CL-600 belonging to Bush Aviation, which though Irvine-based is managed by John Hagestad, who lives in Newport Beach.

Lastly, given the City of Newport Beach’s activism against expansion of business jet operations at John Wayne Airport, city officials might want to rethink their official city webpage titled “BUSINESS CLIMATE,” which touts proximity to John Wayne as a positive:

Newport Beach is known for its mild Pacific coastal climate, it’s [sic] large recreational harbor, great beaches, two public piers, award-winning restaurants, first-class hotels, excellent shopping, corporate offices and an exceptional quality of life. Newport Beach is adjacent to Orange County’s John Wayne Airport, served by most major carriers, and the University of California at Irvine, for access to technology and well educated employees. The City has a diversified and financially solid local economy. It is a popular destination for business and leisure travelers alike.

The Supervisors, who were scheduled to vote on the project during their May 7 meeting, instead delayed the whole matter for further study. They’ll return to it at their May 21 meeting.

Anthony Pignataro has been a journalist since 1996. He spent a dozen years as Editor of MauiTime, the last alt weekly in Hawaii. He also wrote three trashy novels about Maui, which were published by Event Horizon Press. But he got his start at OC Weekly, and returned to the paper in 2019 as a Staff Writer.

7 Replies to “Newport Beach vs. Newport Beach at John Wayne Airport”

  1. Oh the things folks put up with to be in 92660.
    Eddie Martin started that airport almost one hundred years ago.
    Since then some of the priciest properties in the O.C. are directly under the flight path.
    The noise and pollution does not seem to affect the property values.
    (although it kept me from relocating there)
    Why would an additional few flights change anything?
    Too bad Irvine unwisely chose houses, traffic and a failed “Great Park” instead of an airport.

  2. Love the idea to write down the tail numbers. They will jump on this! That’s the seafety they are probably targeting: hide the tail numbers from too curious eyes loitering along Irvine Ave at Bison, and know about that pesky registry that lists the owners. 😉

  3. This article is surprisingly one sided. Why would it be surprising that a third of the small jets at an airport located adjacent to Newport Beach are asssociated with Newport Beach? The fact that 5 wealthy individuals have planes (and, yes, many more do) does not negate the other more pressing fact that the possible expansion would permit more air traffic – without curfew – which in turn causes more air pollution and noise pollution. This is not about the ultra-wealthy people wanting to have their cake and eat it, too. It’s about air quality and noise and the rest of the residents in the take off and landing (Tustin) flight paths with families and young children who want to enjoy their neighborhoods and air they breathe. The airport does not need to expand. Fyi, I am not a billionaire and live in Costa Mesa.

  4. This is a countywide problem! Newport Beach is not the only city getting slammed by more air traffic morning noon and night where we never did before! Some of that is the FAA’s NextGen program which moved ALL of us coastal residents from Seal Beach to San Juan Capistrano and everywhere in between (including inland Aliso Viejo) to be under a very congested flight path, and some of it is the sheer increase in small / General Aviation planes out of JWA.This is NOT about a few rich people in Newport whining about nothing. It is a real problem for our health, polluted air, well being, sleep, ability to concentrate, enjoy our homes and yards like we used to, property values, sensitive environmental areas like the Back Bay, Wood Canyon, etc. whether you live in a modest condo in Laguna Niguel or a McMansion in Newport. I moved 20+ miles from JWA to be away from all the airplane noise, then overnight 2 years ago we are now under this fucked up flight path with non-stop small planes from JWA. Enough already!

  5. it’s a mistake to say that “rich people” are the ones under the airport. my condo was built in 1965. i moved here in the early ’90s when there were 13 — count ’em — 13 commercial departures each day. now there are more than 130. add in general aviation and you’re close to 200 flights per day.

    we’re not rich here, we’re middle class people who purchased affordable homes many years ago when the airport was small and unintrusive. now it provides a daily assault of noise and pollution, not to mention a negative mpact on property values.

    your coverage could be a little more accurate and balanced. how about spending some time over here in the bluffs so you can see for yourself how “rich” we are not, and how soul-crushingly noisy and dirty JWA actually is.

Leave a Reply to garry lukas Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *