It’s called the South County Traffic Relief Effort, or SCTRE to its friends. Consider it a plan by both Caltrans and the Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) to relieve traffic congestion in South Orange County.
“The purpose and fundamental objectives of the Project are to materially improve north-south regional mobility in South Orange County and accommodate regional travel demand in a manner that promotes the supporting objectives related to mobility in South Orange County,” states the always exciting SCTRE Preliminary Scoping Report. “Transportation infrastructure improvements are necessary to address the existing and future deficiencies for north-south regional mobility in south Orange County.”
These deficiencies include the extremely well-known fact that “demand approaches or exceeds capacity on I-5 during peak commuting hours and weekends,” there aren’t too many options for travelers stuck on I-5 in South County when there’s a big traffic collision down there and the whole region needs to be a lot more attractive to people walking and biking.
Because this is Orange County, the way to solve these problems is apparently to expand South County’s already rich and confusing network of toll roads. Specifically, the project (which spans 10 Orange County cities) includes 10 alternatives (well, 11 if you count Alternative 1, the “No Build Alternative” that leaves everything exactly as it is) that propose a variety of different road expansions. Their numbering is a bit unusual because there were originally 20 or so but over the last couple years some have been kicked out for being infeasible.
Anyway, here they are:
Alternative 9: Connect Ortega Highway and Antonio Parkway to Avery Parkway and SR-73
Alternative 11: Widen I-5 to include a new general purpose lane in each direction from the El Toro Y to Basilone Road, near the San Diego County line.
Alternative 12: Convert two existing HOV lanes in each direction on I-5 from I-405 to Alicia Parkway into HOT (high occupancy toll) lanes.
Alternative 13: Widen Los Patrones Parkway and convert it into a toll road from Oso Parkway to north of Cow Camp Road, then extend SR-241 by adding a four-lane toll road from north of Cow Camp Road to I-5. This alignment would predominantly affect San Juan Capistrano.
Alternative 14: Similar to Alternative 13, but the alignment would affect San Clemente.
Alternative 17: Again, similar to Alternative 13, but the alignment would affect San Clemente and San Juan Capistrano in different ways than the previous two.
Alternative 18: Build a four-lane arterial connection from SR-73 to Antonio Parkway.
Alternative 21: Extend Los Patrones Parkway with two lanes in each direction from Cow Camp Road to Avenida La Pata (perhaps as a toll road, though that hasn’t been concluded yet). This alternative also includes a “median-to-median HOT lane connector from SR-73 to I-5.”
Alternative 22: Similar to Alternative 21.
Alternative 23: Extension of “managed lanes” (HOV or HOT lanes) on I-5 from Basilone Road to either Avenida Pico or the SR-73 terminus.
Each alternative is spelled out in a lot more detail here.
In any case, there seems to be some question as to whether all this is really necessary, and it’s coming from the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), of all places. In fact, it might even be unjust, according to this Nov. 12 Orange County Register story:
The Orange County Transportation Authority has spent millions out of its half-cent sales tax revenue to widen and add carpool lanes on the 5 Freeway in the region. Converting those carpool lanes to tolled lanes, OCTA officials argue, would mean drivers pay twice for projects on the I-5, once through sales tax and again through tolls.
Public comment on the alternatives opened on Nov. 8 and runs just a month, to 5 p.m. on Dec. 9 (in the above cited Register story, project officials say they’re expanding the public comment period to two months, but the official SCTRE website still lists Dec. 4 as the cut-off date). Those wishing to submit comments can do so by email (sc*****@SC***.org) or by mailing them to the following address:
Caltrans District 12, 1750 E. 4th St., Santa Ana, CA, 92705 (write attn: Env/SCTRE Scoping on the envelope)
There are also two public hearings on the project coming up. The first takes place on Wednesday, Nov. 20 at the Norman P. Murray Community and Senior Center (24932 Veterans Way, Mission Viejo) from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. There will be another public meeting on Wednesday, Dec. 4 at the Ocean Institute (24200 Dana Point Harbor Dr., Dan Point) from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. You can also submit public comments on the project in person at either of these meetings.
Anthony Pignataro has been a journalist since 1996. He spent a dozen years as Editor of MauiTime, the last alt weekly in Hawaii. He also wrote three trashy novels about Maui, which were published by Event Horizon Press. But he got his start at OC Weekly, and returned to the paper in 2019 as a Staff Writer.
Oh good, more toll roads I’ll never drive, we already pay to much in taxes for roads that aren’t kept up because of money going into pockets. Just say NO to all toll roads!
You’ll never drive? That’s exactly what the fascists running CA are trying to promote
I dont understand. Taxpayers dont want toll roads. We already pay for roads through gas tax and higher registration. The only one that wants toll roads is the politicians. Why are some politicians getting paid by the toll roads.? The 241 toll road was supposed to be tuned into a public road in 2015. Have you noticed how freeways are no longer maintained where toll roads are. NO TOLL ROADS. Let’s vote for people that are against toll roads , and get rid of the rest of the city officials and politicians that vote for toll roads.
The meeting in Mission Viejo is 11/20, not 11/30.
Thanks for catching that! I have corrected the text.
This article is rife with spelling errors. The author clearly went to public schools in California. The author’s editor is equally illiterate.
It is spelled “road,” not “rode.”
It is spelled “bit,” not “but.”
This is typical OC Weakling third grade journalism.
Thanks for catching those! I have corrected the text.
Just wait until Metro implements their congestion tax HAHAHAHA
I actually want more toll roads. If we could build these highways via the half cent tax, they would have been built already. I take the 133,241, 261 all the time. If I was driving to and from San Diego, I would take one of these new toll roads as well. If it wasn’t congestion, I would have alternatives.
Please, no more toll roads. We don’t want them. We don’t really need them. What we need are public arterials paid for by taxes already being collected. The OCTA is great at siphoning off funds from actual solutions.
TCA trying to get more $$$ . Instilling this fake narrative . There is no traffic problem in South Orange County
People like Bryan want more toll roads. Why don’t guys like this just donate more money to the Democrat spending machine. They think more money will fix everything… idiots!
The only people arguing about where the toll road should go are rich people; people complaining about their future property values and people who can afford to spend the money to drive it on a regular basis.
Oh! And developers! Can’t forget them…
Do you mean SATURDAY November 30th?
No, Wednesday, Nov. 20. I’ve already corrected the text
CBD exceeded my expectations in every way thanks https://www.cornbreadhemp.com/blogs/learn/how-much-cbd-oil-do-i-give-my-dog . I’ve struggled with insomnia on years, and after demanding CBD because of the key once upon a time, I finally trained a loaded evening of restful sleep. It was like a force had been lifted off the mark my shoulders. The calming effects were indulgent yet scholarly, allowing me to meaning slow naturally without feeling confused the next morning. I also noticed a reduction in my daytime angst, which was an unexpected but receive bonus. The tactfulness was a flash lusty, but nothing intolerable. Overall, CBD has been a game-changer quest of my sleep and anxiety issues, and I’m grateful to have discovered its benefits.