Earlier this year, Santiago Chamu won a generous plea deal from local prosecutors.
Represented at taxpayer expense by a public defender, Chamu agreed to serve 150 days in the Orange County Jail and undergo three years of supervised probation in exchange for the government dropping a 2011 felony robbery charge to a non-strike, grand theft count.
Chamu decided after the deal that he wanted a more generous arrangement with less time in jail.
He appealed and the criminal justice system appointed yet another free lawyer to handle his complaint.
But there was a problem: Chamu's appellate lawyer carefully studied the case and couldn't find a single, legitimate issue.
At the California Court of Appeal based in Santa Ana, a three-justice panel headed by William Rylaarsdam also reviewed the case and found nothing improper.